Note: Over the next two weeks leading into the first full slate of college football games, we will take a look at 14 of the top teams heading into 2016 and analyze their chances at making the 2016 College Football Playoff. We continue this series with Michigan State, a team that finished 12-2 last year and is ranked 12th in the 2016 AP preseason top 25 poll.
|MSU will make the 2016 CFP because...||MSU won't make the 2016 CFP because...|
Ryan Cooper: All right Jack, let's keep it going with team No. 5 on our college football countdown: Michigan State.
There are some roster changes like every football team goes through, but this is still a really strong team, and I think it can repeat its 2015 success and go back to the Playoff.
Jack Freifelder: All fair points, and if not for a minor hiccup at unranked Nebraska this team could have been riding even higher into its matchup with Alabama. Attitude is everything, and a 13-0 squad would have been oozing confidence heading into the Playoff.
Take the hangover factor and add in some of the departures on the offensive side of the ball, and all of a sudden there are some real questions marks for head coach Mark Dantonio and Co. For example, how does this squad deal with the departure of Connor Cook at QB?
RC: It cannot be argued that Cook carved out a nice legacy during his time in East Lansing, playing a key role in elevating Michigan State to the upper tier of programs.
His mark of seven interceptions in 13 games last year was phenomenal, and his roughly 240 yards per game ranked 39th in the nation. But his 56 percent completion rate was mediocre at best. With Tyler O'Connor and Damion Terry competing for the starting job, I think the production can be replaced.
O'Connor profiles similarly to Cook as a pro-style, strong-armed quarterback while Terry is a dual-threat option who could open up the offense a lot more with his legs. And if you recall, it wasn't Cook who went in Columbus and gave Ohio State its only loss last year; it was O'Connor.
And the Spartans are in luck that they return the team's top three running backs — a trio that accounted for 22 TDs on the ground. But my real worry is on the outside at the skill positions.
Michigan State's top two receiving threats (Aaron Burbridge and Macgarrett Kings Jr: 125 receptions, 1700+ yards, 12 TDs, collectively) are gone and that leaves a lot to be desired in terms of would be pass-catchers.
Names like sophomore Felton Davis III and redshirt freshman Darrell Stewart Jr. have given the coaching ranks something to keep an eye on, but QB-wideout chemistry is not something you want to be cultivating midseason. If the offense is going to have some punch this year, they'd better develop a rapport quickly in the season opener against Furman because two weeks later they'll be in South Bend, Ind., for a battle with Notre Dame.
RC: Davis and Stewart do look like solid targets, and watch out for R.J. Shelton, who played second-fiddle to Burbridge last year but is a popular pick to emerge as one of the best receivers in the Big Ten for his final season.
JF: Running game was definitely a weapon and controlling the line of scrimmage seems to be a main focus for Michigan State — on both sides of the ball. With no real reason to expect that to change, the topic of focus has to be the vaunted Spartans defense. Where are we looking as we head into 2016-'17?
RC: I think that's the side of the ball that you really get excited about when you form high expectations for the Spartans.
Sure, Shalique Calhoun and his 10.5 sacks are gone, but they still have potential All-Big Ten talent in each of the three defensive position groups: Malik McDowell on the line; Riley Bullough in the middle; and Montae Nicholson and Demetrious Cox in the backfield. This team ranked 25th and 26th in points and yards allowed per game last year, respectively, and there's no reason to expect any deviation from the style Dantonio has put together.
JF: Fair enough, the stats are good. The numbers I like: 37 sacks, 15 picks, 13 fumble recoveries, good for 15th, 25th and 8th, respectively in the country. Mix in two defensive touchdowns and that's a helluva year. No arguments there.
But one number I don't like is two, as in two redshirt freshmen slated to start in this team's defensive unit: David Bowell and Raequan Williams.
Both Williams and Bowell have had the appropriate amount of time to marinate with the team's defensive scheme, but this is a high-functioning unit that needs to be in top gear early. I don't want to pin the lot of the team on two players, but there can be no weak links in the team's front seven if we are going to see any semblance of last year's dominance.
RC: Inexperience is never a plus, but two weak links shouldn't make the whole 11-man system crash (not that I think Williams nor Bowell will be particularly weak).
The last note I want to briefly touch on is MSU's schedule.
Unlike a team such as Houston that can wave goodbye to the Playoff if it loses to Oklahoma, I think the Spartans can afford to eat a loss, as they did last year. It would be preferable if that loss didn't come against Michigan or Ohio State for tie-breaking purposes, but I don't see that second game at Notre Dame as a must-win by any means, and I think that can help the team relax.
JF: That's true too, scheduling is definitely in MSU's favor.
The Power 5 naysayers may chime in here, but if we see the Spartans repeat their performance in close games (6-1 in games decided by 7 points or less) and dominate the Big Ten slog, I could see them making a case for themselves — even as a one-loss participant in the Playoff.
But this is the Big Ten.
Beating the likes of Michigan and Ohio State is never a given (lord knows the Spartans' victory over Michigan last year was a godsend), and the East division features a three-headed monster in the form of MSU, OSU and Michigan.
Odds are they could all get in each other's way this year at the top of the Big Ten, so cue all the best from Larry, Curly and Moe, because it may be a Three Stooges' type logjam en route to the CFB Playoff in 2017.
The best part of this all is we only have to wait a few more weeks to start getting some answers here.