wrestling-d1 flag

Greg Johnson | NCAA.com | April 14, 2017

Wrestling Rules Committee recommends stiffer penalties

  Stiffer penalties were recommended by the Wrestling Rules Committee.

Wrestlers who violate NCAA weight assessment protocols, utilize prohibited weight-loss practices or violate medical examination rules may soon face stiffer penalties.

During its annual meeting this week in Indianapolis, the NCAA Wrestling Rules Committee recommended a penalty change that would require a wrestler to miss eight consecutive competitions on his first offense in those areas, and to sit out a year for a second offense.

Wrestlers found to be in violation of the weight management protocols or who engage in prohibited weight loss practices would also be required to recertify their weight at some point during the suspension period. Examples of violations covered under this rule include: urine manipulation during weight assessments; use of rubber suits, saunas, diuretics or intravenous rehydration; skin check forgery or deception.

Additionally, the team’s coach and the director of athletics would receive private reprimands on the first offense for a wrestler who violates the weight management rules. If a second offense occurs, additional institutional penalties will be determined by the rules committee.

All rules changes must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which is scheduled to review wrestling rules proposals during a teleconference June 13.

Currently, a wrestler who violates the prohibited weight-loss practices rules must sit out one competition on the first offense and for a calendar year for a second offense.

The weight management rules were established to protect the health and safety of the participants in the sport.  Currently, wrestlers can lose up to 1.5 percent of their body weight per week. The rules are in place to ensure student-athletes maintain a slow descent toward their competition weight classification.

“We prioritize the health and safety of our athletes, and we didn’t have a current penalty structure or protocol that was consistent in these type of violation scenarios,” said Mark Branch, the wrestling rules committee chair and head coach at Wyoming. “Our student-athletes are expected to do things right, and with continued education, they will understand there is too much at risk to not follow the rules.”

Weight allowance

The committee also recommended when back-to-back dual meet competitions occur, all competitors will receive a 1-pound weight allowance on the second day of competition.

“This is a proposal that will benefit the health and safety of our athletes,” Branch said. “It allows them a better opportunity to nourish and hydrate properly when faced with these rare scheduling situations.”

Ear protection

The committee proposed removing the current requirement that ear protection must be worn, and while it still recommends that all student-athletes wear the equipment in both practice and competition, it would be the student-athlete’s choice.   

“The committee still recommends the use of ear protection, but it has been proven that ear protection offers no protection when it comes to concussions,” Branch said. “In some cases, the ear protection may irritate or be abrasive to the athlete’s ears and promote cauliflower ear.  We felt our collegiate athletes are mature and educated enough to decide what is best for them and their particular situation.”

Facial hair

The committee recommended wrestlers be allowed to have facial hair of up to a half-inch as long as the skin of the wrestler is visible so that an accurate medical examination can occur. If the official rules the beard is too thick, the wrestler will be required to cover up the facial hair using a non-abrasive facial covering or a face mask.

Currently, wrestlers are not allowed to have facial hair unless they file for a waiver to explain why they should be an exception to the rule.

Third-party video review

The committee recommended an optional rule to allow the hiring of a third-party registered official to conduct video reviews on coaches’ challenges in dual meets and tournaments.

“This makes the process more in line with other sports, but with budgetary concerns, we wanted to make it an option rather than a mandate,” Branch said.

Other rules recommendations:

When in the neutral position, the referee will verbally announce a danger signal to any wrestler who becomes stationary on his back with his shoulders at an angle of 90 degrees or less to the mat surface. The verbal announcement will be followed by an audible three-count. If the referee reaches the third count and the wrestler is still on his back within the 90-degree angle, control will be considered to have been established and a takedown will be awarded.

  • Wrestlers will be limited to a maximum of six matches per day.
  • A recommendation was made to eliminate the Feb. 15 deadline for a wrestler to be down to his lowest-allowable weight class. The committee believes, since all student-athletes must adhere to the 1.5 percent weight loss guidelines, there is no sound rationale for maintaining the arbitrary Feb. 15 deadline. 
  • Wrestlers will be allowed to certify at their weight classifications until the first date of competition. Even though the certification timeline is being extended, the 1.5 percent weight loss descent requirement would remain unchanged. 
  • Coaches will now indicate the intent to use a video review by throwing a red or green foam brick into the competition circle.

The committee also made several editorial changes to the Wrestling Rule Book and worked on a reorganization of the book. 

Everything you need to know about the new college wrestling rules ahead of the 2022-2023 season

Breaking down the new NCAA rules changes including freshman eligibility requirements and scholarship regulations.

Iowa wrestling sets DI wrestling dual-meet attendance record

The University of Iowa’s fanbase, leaders in Division I attendance since 2007, set a new record for home average of 14,905, selling out the entire season at Carver-Hawkeye Arena in Iowa City.

These are the college stars to watch at the 2022 men’s U23 world team trials

Here’s everything you need know about the top collegiate competitors in this event and the key storylines to follow for those athletes.

Subscribe To Email Updates

Enter your information to receive emails about offers, promotions from NCAA.com and our partners